EREMOBATINAE
  Eremobates
      angustus group
      aztecus group
      lapazi group
     pallipes group
      palpisetulosus group
        Eremobates affinis
        Eremobates ajoanus
        Eremobates bajadae
        Eremobates bajaensis
        Eremobates bantai
        Eremobates bixleri
        Eremobates coahuilanus
        Eremobates fagei
        Eremobates girardi
        Eremobates gracilidens
        Eremobates guenini
        Eremobates hessei
        Eremobates hystrix
        Eremobates inkopaensis
        Eremobates inyoanus
        Eremobates kastoni
        Eremobates kiseri
        Eremobates kraepelini
        Eremobates leechi
        Eremobates marathoni
        Eremobates nanus
        Eremobates nivis
        Eremobates nodularis
        Eremobates norrisi
        Eremobates otavonae
        Eremobates pallidus
        Eremobates palpisetulosus
        Eremobates papillatus
        Eremobates pimanus
        Eremobates polhemusi
        Eremobates purpusi
        Eremobates pyriflora
        Eremobates scopulatellus
        Eremobates scopulatus
        Eremobates spissus
        Eremobates tejonus
        Eremobates texanus
        Eremobates titschacki
        Eremobates tuberculatus
        Eremobates vicinus
        Eremobates villosus
        Eremobates williamsi
      scaber group
      vallis group
  Eremocosta
  Eremorhax
  Eremothera
  Horribates
THEROBATINAE
  Chanbria
  Eremochelis
  Hemerotrecha

Eremobates hessei (Roewer 1934)

Eremopus hessei Roewer, 1934: 564, figs 324i, 326d; Moritz and Fischer, 1980: 143.
Eremobates hessei (Roewer): Muma, 1970a: 18, figs 18-19 (in part, type only; misidentification in part, see Eremobates nodularis Muma); Muma, 1974a: 8; Muma, 1974b: 388, 389, 390; Muma, 1974c: 14; Muma, 1976: 16; Rowland and Reddell, 1976: 8; Muma, 1979: 322-324, 326, 327; Muma, 1980a: 132; Muma, 1980b: 269; Muma, 1986: 7; Muma, 1987: 7, 20; Vázquez Rojas, 1995: 30; Vázquez Rojas, 1996e: 76, Brookhart and Brookhart, 2006: 309.

HOLOTYPE: United States.

Original description

SUBSEQUENT ACCOUNTS:
Muma 1986

Eremobates hessei (Roewer)

Eremopus hessei Roewer, 1934,
Eremobates hessei Muma, 1970, p. 18. (type only; misplacement of nodularis Muma from Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona by Muma (1970).

Females are distinguished by the narrower anterior lobes of the opercula, no trace ctenidia, and the presence of only 1 intermediate tooth between the medial and anterior teeth of the fixed cheliceral finger . There are no additional records of the species, but it is probable that it is a central Mexico form.

DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLISHED RECORds:

nOTES: