|
EREMOBATINAE
Eremobates angustus group aztecus group lapazi group pallipes group palpisetulosus group Eremobates affinis Eremobates ajoanus Eremobates bajadae Eremobates bajaensis Eremobates bantai Eremobates bixleri Eremobates coahuilanus Eremobates fagei Eremobates girardi Eremobates gracilidens Eremobates guenini Eremobates hessei Eremobates hystrix Eremobates inkopaensis Eremobates inyoanus Eremobates kastoni Eremobates kiseri Eremobates kraepelini Eremobates leechi Eremobates marathoni Eremobates nanus Eremobates nivis Eremobates nodularis Eremobates norrisi Eremobates otavonae Eremobates pallidus Eremobates palpisetulosus Eremobates papillatus Eremobates pimanus Eremobates polhemusi Eremobates purpusi Eremobates pyriflora Eremobates scopulatellus Eremobates scopulatus Eremobates spissus Eremobates tejonus Eremobates texanus Eremobates titschacki Eremobates tuberculatus Eremobates vicinus Eremobates villosus Eremobates williamsi scaber group vallis group Eremocosta Eremorhax Eremothera Horribates THEROBATINAE Chanbria Eremochelis Hemerotrecha
|
Eremobates bajaensis Muma 1986
Eremobates
bajaensis Muma, 1986: 5-6, fig. 13; Muma, 1987: 5-6, fig. 13; Vázquez Rojas,
1995: 30; Vázquez Rojas, 1996e: 76;.Brookhart and
Brookhart, 2006: 309 HOLOTYPE: Male holotype from 0.5 miles south of La Virgen at 2,000 ft., Baja California Norte, Mexico on April 9, 1969 by S . C. Williams, deposited in the California Academy of Science in San Francisco. Male paratype from Socorro Sand Dunes at 100 ft . , Baja California Norte, Mexico on April 6, 1969 by S. C. Williams, deposited in the American Museum of Natural History.
Original
description
chelicerae, and above measurements and ratios. The specimens also have a mesoventral row of 6 or 7 distinguishable spine-like setae apically on the palpal femur and basally a mesoventral row of 4 distinguishable spine-like setae on the palpal tibia.
SUBSEQUENT ACCOUNTS: DISTRIBUTION: PUBLISHED RECORds: nOTES: Muma 1986: Distinguished from other male group members that lack ctenidia and scopulae by the presence of a distinct mesal tooth, the obscure "bilobed anterior tooth and the laterally viewed obscure ventral notch of the movable cheliceral finger. The fondal notch is equally as deep as wide and narrower than the basal width of the fixed cheliceral finger. E pallidus Muma and Brookhart seems to be the most closely related species but the lack of ctenidia in this species and the nearly indistinguishable anterior tooth are distinctive. Females are unknown.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
