|
PHYLOGENY/TAXONOMY

 









 

|
Family
Ammotrechidae Roewer 1934
| |
|
|
|

Adult male
Ammotrechula pilosa Muma
from California, USA (photo by Warren E. Savary)
|
Family
Ammotrechidae Roewer 1934
Ammotrechidae Roewer, 1934: 578-579
;
Kästner, 1933-1935: 296; Birula, 1938: 12; Mello-Leitão, 1938b: 10-11;
Muma, 1951: 122
;
Kaestner, 1968: 225; Muma, 1970a: 44; Muma, 1971b: 3-4
;
Muma, 1976: 9; Muma, 1982: 103-104; Maury, 1985b: 76-77, 79; Muma, 1989:
45-46; El-Hennawy, 1990: 23; Armas, 1993: 41; Armas, 2004: 32
.
Diagnosis: Roewer
(1934) characterized the family as follows:
"Solifugae,
am Prosoma mit teilweise vom Propeltidium getrenntem Lobus exterior,
mit Plagula mediana, die von den Arci anteriores nur unscharf getrennt
ist. Die Arci posteriores kurz und nach hinten divergierend (Abb. 22).
Propeltidium, Arci, prosomale und vordere opisthosomale Tergite oft,
besonders beim ♂, mit Dornen oder Dornborsten besetzt, die dann beim ♂
auch auf der Dorsalfläche der Oheliceren aufzutreten pflegen (Abb. 329,
c, d und 336, a). Die paarigen Stigmen des
Opisthosoma sind frei sichtbar und nicht durch besondere Haarpolster
oder Zähnchenkämme am Hinterrand ihrer Sternite geschützt (wie Abb.
190). Die opisthosomalen Sternite tragen weder beim ♂ noch beim ♀ echte
Ctenidien, und das Genitalsternit der ♀♀ ist artlich nicht differenziert,
sondern normal gebaut.
Das GebiB der Cheliceren ist
bei beiden Geschlechtern gleich gestaltet und ohne Differenzierung der
Zähne in Form und Zahl. Der unbewegliche Finger trägt 2 oder 3 (im
ersteren Falle fast gleich große, im anderen Falle ungleich große, deren
erster dann kleiner als der dritte und größer als der zweite ist)
Vorderzähne (selten sogar 4), 1 (selten 2) kleinen Zwischenzahn, 1 (von
allen größten) Hauptzahn und 3-4 (selten 2 oder mehr als 4) kleinere
laterale und mediale Wangenzähne. Der bewegliche Finger hat stets
nur 1 Vorderzahn, 1 (selten 2) Zwischenzahn und 1 (stets größten)
Hauptzahn, neben dem bei vielen Formen noch 1 medialer, etwas proximal
stehender Wangenzahn auftritt. Das Flagellum des ♂ bildet eine
durchsichtige Spelze, deren dorsaler und ventraler Rand stets
medialwärts mehr oder minder eingerollt und fein befranst ist. Diese
Spelze ist stets unbeweglich, also nicht drehbar, mit ihrer verjüngten
Spitze nach vorn gerichtet und mit einem längsovalen (nicht kreisrunden)
Ring verstärkten Chitins an der Medialfläche des unbeweglichen Fingers
etwa in der Höhe des Haupt- oder des 1. medialen Wangenzahnes befestigt
(Abb. 329, d usw.). Besonders differenzierte Borsten eines
"Flagellum-Komplexes" treten nicht auf.
Pedipalpen mit unbeweglichem
Tarsus, nur behaart oder an Tibia und Metatarsus oft mit ventralen
Paaren langer Dornborsten oder kurzer Dornen, meist auch mit
Zylinderborsten, diese oft auch beim ♀ vorhanden; eine papillöse Scopula
fehlt immer.
Laufbeine normal gebaut und
nicht zum Graben eingerichtet; 1. Tarsus stets 1-g1iedrig, stets ohne
eine Spur von Endkrallen und wie die übrigen Glieder des 1. Beines
unbewehrt und ohne Dornen. 2. und 3. Bein gleichartig bewehrt: Tibia
dorsal mit oder ohne (artlich konstantem) Enddorn, ventral mit 2
apikalen Dornborsten, Metatarsus dorsal mit einer Längsreihe aus 3 oder
5 Dornen, ventral meist mit 1.1.2 Dornen. Der 2. und 3. Tarsus ist meist
1-, seltener 2-gliedrig; im ersteren Falle mit gattungsweise konstanter
ventraler Bedornung, im zweiten Falle ventral unbewehrt. Ein dorsaler
Enddorn fehlt dem 2. und 3. Tarsus stets, ihre Endkrallen sind kahl mit
einem Unguiculus, der viel kürzer ist als ihr Pedunculus. - Am 4. Bein
sind alle Glieder, einschließlich des Tarsus, dorsal unbewehrt und weder
mit Dornborsten noch mit Dornen bewehrt; Tibia und Metatarsus tragen
ventral einzeln oder zu Paaren stehende Dornen oder Dornborsten. Der
Tarsus ist 1-4-gliedrig (siehe die Subfamilien) und ventral
gattungsweise konstant bedornt, selten - am 4-g1iedrigen Tarsus - ganz
unbewehrt, seine Endkrallen sind ebenso gebaut wie die des 2. und 3.
Tarsus. Der Pulvillus des 2. -4. Tarsus ist nicht sonderlich gespalten."
[Solifugae,
which on the prosoma have the exterior lobes of propeltidium partially
separated, with the plagula mediana only partially separated from
arci anteriores. Posterior arci short and diverging posteriorly (Fig.
22). Propeltidium, arci, prosoma and anterior opisthosomal tergite
often, especially in males, bearing spines or spinelike setae, which in
the male, also occur on the dorsal surface of the chelicerae (Fig. 329
c, d, and 326a). The paired stigma of the
opisthosoma are freely visible and not protected by special setae or
denticles at the posterior end of their sternites (Fig. 190).
The opisthosomal sternites of both ♂
and ♀ lack
genuine ctenidia, and the genital sternite is not specifically
differentiated, but is normally developed.
The dentition of the chelicerae
is similar in both sexes, without differentiation of the teeth in form
and number. The fixed
finger bears 2 or 3 anterior teeth (rarely even 4), which in the first
case are similar in size, and in the other case are unequal in size,
with the first being smaller than third and larger than the second), 1
(rarely 2) small intermediate teeth, 1 (largest of all) main tooth and
3-4 (rarely 2 or more than 4) smaller lateral and medial cheek teeth.
The movable finger always has only 1 anterior tooth, 1 (rarely 2)
intermediate teeth and 1 (always the largest) main tooth, besides which
in many species arises 1 medial, somewhat proximally situated cheek
tooth. The flagellum of the
♂ forms a transparent husk, whose dorsal and ventral edge
are always more or less rolled up medially and finely fringed. This
husk is always immovable, thus not rotatable, and is attached, with its
tapered point directed forward, by a longitudinal, oval (not circular),
reinforced chitinous ring to the medial surface of the fixed finger
approximately at the level of the main tooth or of the 1st medial cheek
tooth (fig. 329, d etc.). Particularly
differentiated bristles of a "flagellum complex" do not arise.
Pedipalps with immovable tarsus, only setose, or on tibia and metatarsus
often with ventral pairs of long spine-like bristles or short spines,
usually also with cylinder bristles, this arrangement often also present
on ♀; a
papillose scopula is always missing.
Running legs normally built
and not modified for digging; 1st Tarsus always 1-segmented, always
without a trace of terminal claws and, and like the remaining segments
of the 1st leg unarmed and lacking spines. 2nd
and 3rd legs each armed the same: tibia with or without dorsal terminal
spine (constant within a species), with 2 ventral apical spinelike
bristles, metatarsus with a dorsal longitudinal row of 3 to 5 spines,
usually with 1.1.2 ventral spines. The 2nd
and 3rd tarsi are usually 1 -, rarely 2-segmented (in the first case the
ventral spination is constant within a genus, in the second case the
tarsi are ventrally unarmed). A dorsal terminal spine
is always missing from the 2nd and 3rd tarsi, the terminal claws of
which are bald, and the unguiculus is much shorter than the pedunculus.
The 4th leg is dorsally unarmed on all segments, including the tarsus,
and bears neither spinelike bristles nor spines; the tibia and
metatarsus carry individual or paired erect ventral spines or spinelike
bristles. The tarsus is 1- to 4-segmented (see the subfamilies) and
adorned consistenty within each genus, rarely - on the 4-segmented
tarsus - completely unarmed, with the terminal claws just as those of
the 2nd and 3rd tarsi. The pulvilli of the 2nd – 4th tarsi
are not particularly divided."

Fig. 22 = Dorsal view of prosoma of Ammotrecha
sp.; Fig. 329c = Saronomus capensis Kraepelin ♂, chelicerae,
propeltidium and anterior free tergites showing distribution of spines,
in dorsal view; Fig 329d = Saronomus capensis Kraepelin ♂, right
chelicera with medial flagellum; Fig 336a = Neocleobis solitarius
(Banks), ♂,
right chelicera, right half of propeltidium hälfte with
pedipalp; Fig. 190 = Paired stigma on the third opisthosomal sternite of
Solpuga venator Pocock, seen.from the outside seen (after
preparation) [st = sternite surface with long, strong setae; r = chitin
ring around spiracular opening; s = spiracular opening; t =
intersegmental membrane at the posterior margin of the sternite].

Mesal view of chelicera of male
Ammotrechula catalinae Muma
from Sonora, Mexico, showing
flagellum (photo by Warren E, Savary).
Muma (1951) characterized the family as
follows:
"Solpugida with exterior lobes of propeltidium partially separated from
the peltidium. Propeltidium with anterior margin recurved. Median
plagula of peltidium indistinctly separated from anterior arci.
Posterior arci of parapeltidium short and diverging posteriorly.
Propeltidium, peltidium, parapeltidium, mesopeltidium, metapeltidium,
anterior abdominal tergite, and dorsal surfaces of the chelicerae often
covered with spines. Paired spiracles of the abdomen distinct and not
protected. The first postspiracular abdominal sternite of the males
does not bear true ctenidia. Genital sternite of females not
distinctly, specifically differential.
Cheliceral dentition similar in
males and females but often exhibiting sexual dimorphism in a
modification of the fixed finger and teeth of the male. The fixed
finger bears three primary teeth that may or may not be separated by a
variable number of intermediate teeth. The movable finger bears two
primary teeth, a variable number of intermediate teeth, and often a
mesal tooth just mesad of the basal primary tooth. A mesal and ectal
row of fondal teeth occurs between the fingers of the chelicerae. The
male flagellum consists of an immovable, transparent, elliptical
membrane of which the dorsal and ventral margins are frequently finely
fringed and bent or curled mesally. The anterior end of the flagellum
is usually attenuated, and the flagellum is attached to the fixed finger
by an elliptical chitinized ring at or about the vertical level of the
fondal teeth.
Palpus with an immovable
tarsus; metatarsus and tibia often bear a series of short or long paired
spines in addition to the usual hairs and cylinder bristles. There is
no scopula on the palpus.
Walking legs normal. Tarsi of
first legs unsegmented and without claws or spines. Tarsi of second and
third legs usually unsegmented, rarely with two segments and bearing a
generically variable series of ventral spines. There is no dorsal
terminal spine on the tarsi of the second or third legs. Tarsi of
fourth legs with one to four segments and bearing a generically variable
series of ventral spines. Leg spination otherwise variable."
...and later (1976) offered the following
characterization:
"Tiny
to moderate-sized (5 -22 mm). short-legged to long-legged solpugids with
a terminal anus. The exterior lobes of the propeltidiurn are free to
completely fused. The tarsi of legs 1 lack claws. The tarsal
segmentation of legs 1 to 4 is variable: 1, 1-2, 1-2, 1-4; and the
tarsal claws are smooth. The male cheliceral flagellum is a paraxially
immovable, essentially oval, membranous structure attached to the mesial
surf'ace by a disk. The female genital opcrcula arc not differentiated
f'ronm other abdodimal sternites and are not specifically variable,
except perhaps in the ratio of length to width and in the length of the
caudal notch."
Distribution: North,
Central and South America.
Included taxa: At present,
87 living species and a single fossil species are assigned to this
family. They are distributed among 21 genera, which in turn are
distributed among five subfamilies.
Ammotrecha (10 species),
Ammotrechella (17 species),
Ammotrechesta (5 species),
Ammotrechinus (1 species),
Ammotrechula (12 species),
Antillotrecha
(2 species),
Campostrecha (1 species), Dasycleobis (1 species),
Neocleobis
(1 species), and Pseudocleobis
(20 species), are placed
together in the subfamily Ammotrechinae, whose members are broadly distributed through North, Central,
and South America. The monotypic genus
Mortola of Argentina is placed by
itself in the subfamily Mortolinae. Nothopuga (2 species, both from Argentina) is the sole
genus in the Nothopuginae.
The four Argentinian species comprising the genus Oltacola are assigned
to the subfamily Oltacolinae.
Branchia (3 species), Chinchippus (1 species),
Innesa (1
species), Procleobis (1 species), and Saronomus (1 species) are placed
in the Saronominae. Three
living species [Chileotrecha
atacamensis,
Eutrecha
longirostris, and
Xenotrecha huebneri],
and the sole known fossil species [Happlodontus
proterus], are not presently assigned to any of the recognized
subfamilies.
Roewer's original characterization of
the family has been accepted by subsequent authors, as has his recognition
of genera based primarily on tarsal
segmentation and the number and arrangement of ventral spine-like setae on
the tarsi. However, Muma (1970) observed that separation on this basis
is problematic, as the ventral spinelike setae are either very difficult to
distinguish or variation in their number and arrangement exists.
Nonetheless, he chose to retain Roewer's (1934) generic concepts "even
though inconsistencies, heterogeneities, and synonymies are indicated."
Muma (1976) later reiterated that " C. F. R Roewer's generic classification,
based on tarsal segmentation, tarsal spinelike setal patterns, tibial
spinelike setal patterns, and basic cheliceral dentition, is generically and
specifically variable, difficult to use, and probably invalid. A generic
revision is needed." Maury (1976) acknowledged past criticisms
of Roewer's classification, but noted that it still appeared useful for the
Ammotrechidae, at least for differentiating the subfamilies, and that other
characters tended to corroborate the classification. He noted, in
particular, the the lack of spines on the tarsi of
Oltacolinae
(present in all other subfamilies), and the articulated, movable tarsi of
the Nothopuginae
(in all other subfamilies, the tarsus and protarsus combine to form a
unique, immovable piece).
The five subfamilies can be identified using the
following tabular key, modified from Maury (1976):
A: Number of segments in tarsi of legs II and
III;
B: Number of segments in the tarsus of leg IV;
C: Spines present on the tarsi of legs II-IV;
D: Tarsi of pedipalps articulated and movable;
E: Intermediate tooth present on movable finger of chelicerae.
|