|
PHYLOGENY/TAXONOMY

 









 
 |
Ammotrecha
stollii (Pocock 1895)
Cleobis stollii ►Pocock, 1895a:
97.
Ammotrecha stollii (Pocock): ►Kraepelin 1901: 115 (as Ammotrecha
stolli); ►Pocock, 1902c: 65, plate 12 figs 8, 8a-b (as Ammotrecha
stolli); ►Kraepelin, 1908a: 211 (as Ammotrecha stolli); ►Banks,
1909b: 234 (as Ammotrecha stolli); Banks, 1913: 684 (as Ammotrecha
stolli); ►Roewer, 1932: fig. 132 (as Ammotrecha stolli); Kästner,
1933-1935: fig. 345 (as Ammotrecha stolli); ►Roewer, 1934: 598, figs
337e, 338b (in part, see Ammotrecha picta Pocock) (as
Ammotrecha stolli); Caporiacco, 1938: 254 (as Ammotrecha stolli);
Kästner, 1940: fig. 80 (as Ammotrecha stolli); ►Roewer 1941: 183 (as
Ammotrecha stolli); Zilch, 1946: 151 (as Ammotrecha stolli);
►Muma, 1951: 123-125, figs 272-276 (as Ammotrecha stolli); ►Roewer, 1954a: 383 (as
Ammotrecha stolli); ►Roewer,
1954d: 63 (as Ammotrecha stolli); ►Muma, 1970a: 45 (Table 13), 50 (as Ammotrecha stolli);
Rowland and Reddell, 1976: 10 (as Ammotrecha stolli); Vázquez Rojas
1981: ?; ►Muma, 1986:
14-15, 21 (as Ammotrecha stolli); Muma, 1987: 15, 21 (as Ammotrecha
stolli); Maes, Palacios Vargas and Jimenez, 1989: 6 (as Ammotrecha
stolli); Armas, 1992: 132, fig. 5 (as Ammotrecha stolli); ►Armas,
1993: 51-54, figs 14-16 (as Ammotrecha stolli); ►Vázquez Rojas, 1995:
31 (as Ammotrecha stolli); ►Armas, 1996: 32 (as Ammotrecha stolli);
►Armas and Maes, 1996: 18 (as Ammotrecha stolli); Vázquez Rojas,
1996e: 76 (as Ammotrecha stolli); Armas, 2000d: 65-66, figs 9a-d (as
Ammotrecha stolli); ►Harvey 2003: 201. ►Armas, 2004: 60 (as Ammotrecha stolli);
►Brookhart and Brookhart, 2006: 323 (as Ammotrecha stolli).

Ammotrecha stollii
(Pocock 1895), female, from Guatemala.
Photo courtesey of Dr. Arthur Anker, University of Alberta.
HOLOTYPE:
Guatemala:
Retalhuleau (14°31'N 091°40'W) [Date?]
(Stoll), 1 male (holotype). "Male and female types, No. 8605, from
Guatemala in the British Museum (Natural History)." "Female type
from
Retalhuleau, Guatemala (Roewer No. 8605) in BMNH."
Original
description:
Pocock, 1895a: 97:
"(Preliminary diagnosis.) Colour. Head and mandibles entirely pale yellow; upper
surface of the free thoracic
segments and of the anterior seven abdominal segments pale yellow in the
middle, infuscate at
the sides; palp with tibia
lightly infuscate above, protarsus with its proximal third pale, the rest of
it infuscate, the two tints gradually blending; first and second legs
slightly infuscate distally, third more strongly so, with a pale band round
the distal end of the tibia and protarsus; fourth leg with femur, tibia, and
tarsus deeply infuscate, especially the latter two segments, which, however,
have their distal ends ringed with flavous; coxae, trochanters, and tarsi of
all the legs pale."
SUBSEQUENT ACCOUNTS:
Kraepelin 1901:
Mdb. und Cephth. lehmgelb:
Rückenplatten des Abd.
iu der Mittellinie mit
breitem hellen Streifen. zu beiden Seiteu desselben mit einer
mehr oder minder deutlichcn (zuweilen völlig verschwindenden) Binde chokoladefarbener
Flecken, die
aber als
violettrötliche
Färbung jenseits der die Rückenplatten abgrenzenden Längsfurche
auf die Seiten des
Abd. übergeht; Bauchseite des
Abd. gelb. Augenhügel mit weissem Medianstrich. vorn mit 2 längeren und mehreren kurzen Borsten;
Augen scheinbar sehr
genähert. Mxpalp. beim alten ♀ fast ganz hell, sonst das Femur
fast
hell, die Tibia und der Metatarsus
gebräunt, letzterer beim juv. im distalen
Drittel oft scharf abgesetz
braun. 1.-3. Bein meist gelb,
leicht
beraucht; 4. Bein in allen Gliedern wie bei der vorigen Art. - Flagellum des
♂ spelzenförmig gewölbt, eiförmig, seine Ränder weit klaffend, nicht bis
auf einen feinen Längsspalt zusammenschliessend. Metatarsus des
Mxpalp. ventral beim ♂ und ♀ mit 5 langen, starken Dornen, die länger
sind als die kürzeren Cylinderborsten; letztere beim ♂ und ♀ auf der
ventralen Seite des Metatarsus der ganzen Länge nach zahlreich, beim ♂
auch auf der dorsalen Seite; Tibia ventral beim ♂ mit, beim ♀ ohne
Cylinderborsten. L. des Truncus 20 mm.
Pocock (1902):
"♀,
Colour: head-plate pale yellow, ocular tubercle black with a
median pale stripe; mandible yellow, with the fangs ferruginous;
upperside of abdomen with a median yellow stripe, the sides of the
tergal plates fuscous, the fuscous area on each side about as wide as
the median stripe or rather narrower, on the posterior terga the median
stripe gradually dies away; lateral integument of abdomen ashy or
violet-grey above adjacent to the terga, the sides of the thoracic terga
also infuscate; palpi mostly yellow, with distal end of femur and tibia
lightly infuscate, the distal half of the tibia and the tarsus more
deeply infuscate, first leg pale, second only lightly infuscate, third
more strongly infuscate on femur, patella, and tibia, with an indistinct
pale ring around the end of the patella; fourth leg with the femur,
patella, and tibia strongly infuscate, with a distinct and broad yellow
ring around the tip of the patella. Width of head equal to
length of patella of palp, slightly shorter than its tibia and tarsus
and the patella of fourth leg. Mandible with upper
fang armed distally with three large subequal teeth and a small one
between the second and third set almost upon the base of the anterior
side of the latter; lower fang with two larger subequal teeth and a
small tooth between them nearer the base of the inner. Palpi
without spines on femur and patella; tibia with five pairs of
strong short spines beneath, and furnished with numerous cylindrical
bristles. Third and fourth pairs of legs with three
anterior and one posterior distal spine beneath; tarsus with four pairs
of spines beneath.
♂. Like the female in colour, but smaller, and with longer appendages.
Width of head much less than length of patella or tibia and
tarsus of palp or than patella of fourth leg. Upperside of the
tibia and the lower side of the patella of the palp with cylinder
bristles. Flagellum elliptically elongate, its upper and
lower edges widely separated.
Measurements in mm. - ♀, Total length of body 18; width of head 4.3;
length of palp 15, its patella 5; tibia and tarsus 5.3; of fourth leg
16, its patella 5. ♂, Total length 12; width of head 2.5; length
of palp 14, of fourth leg 15."


Abb. l32. Ammotrecha stolli
Poc. (8) Medialansicht der Chelicere.
(Im übrigen wie Abb. 126)(nach Präp.). [Redrawn from Roewer 1932].
Roewer 1934:
1895 beschreibt Pocock diese Art nur mit einigen
Färbungsmerkmalen, ohne Mitteilung morphologischer Einzelheiten. Er
hält sie
für sehr ähnlich der
Ammotrechona
cubae (Lucas) (siehe
S. 596 Nr.
1), von der sie aber
schon durch die ventrale Bedornung des 2. und 3. Tarsus abweicht.
1902 erweitert Pocock seiue Diagnose von
A.
stolli
und bildet auch die Bedornung
des 4. Tarsus ab, die wir am Typus und
weiteren
Stückcn wie er vorfanden.
Das gleiche gilt für die
A. picta
(Pocock 1902 S. 65), die in
keinerlei morphologischen Merkmalen von A. stolli abweicht
und daher mit dieser artgleich zu setzen ist. trotz der
geringfügigen, für die Solifugen ganz allgemein so variablen
Fürbungsunterschiede, die Pocock hier allein zur Abtrennung von
A.
picta benutzt.

Abb. 337e. Rechte Chelicere
mit Flagellum des ♂ in Medialansicht
von Ammotrecha stolli Poc.; Abb. 338b. Rechte Chelicere des ♀
in
Medialansicht von Ammotrecha stolli Poc.
[Redrawn from Roewer 1934].
Muma 1951:
"MALES: Males of this species have not been seen. A
translation of Roewer's redescription of the type and a copy of his
drawing of the chelicerae are included for reference.
"Flagellum with dorsal and ventral edges but slightly turned under,
medial surface consequently exposed to view, the elliptical anchoring
ring lying in the middle of the posterior longitudinal third of the
flagellum; dentition and flagellum [fig. 272 of the present paper];
palpi hairy, with short cylinder bristles ventrally on tibia and
metatarsus, metatarsus with five pairs of rather long spines; second and
third metatarsus dorsally with a longitudinal row of three spines and
ventrally, as also the fourth metatarsus, with 1, 1, 2 spines;
coloration of the mandibles and propeltidium rusty yellow, abdominal
tergites with a broad blackish brown longitudinal band that has a
narrower whitish mid-band, pleura, sternites, coxae and malleoli whitish
yellow, palpi dark brown except on the basal half of the femora and
tarsi, legs browned; body length 14-18 mm."
FEMALES: Total length, 16.0 to 22.0 mm. Chelicerae, 1.4 to 2.1 mm. wide
and 4.4 to 6.4 mm. long. Propeltidium, 3.2 to 4.6 mm. wide and 2.5 to
3.6 mm. long. Coloration in alcohol somewhat faded but apparently as
follows: chelicerae, propeltidium, coxae, and tarsi of walking legs and
coxae of first legs and palpi light rusty yellow; abdomen and remaining
segments of legs and palpi dusky purple; abdomen also with a broad dark
band that contains a wide, light central stripe; dusky areas on legs
darker on dorsal surface; eye tubercle dark; malleoli light. Dentition
typical of the Ammotrechinae as shown in figures 273 and 274. Movable
finger with principal and anterior teeth separated by one intermediate
tooth, anterior tooth slightly smaller than principal tooth, and a
distinct mesal tooth. Dental group of the movable finger occupies
one-fourth of the length of the finger and lies approximately in the
middle of the length of the finger. Fixed finger with large principal
tooth,
one
intermediate tooth between
principal and medial teeth, and medial and anterior teeth subequal in
size. Fondal teeth occurring in
two rows of four each, the
ectal row
graded in size III, I, IV, II, the
mesal row I, III, IV, II. The peak of the dorsal carina of the fixed
finger occurs
directly over the first fondal
tooth of the ectal row. Palpi clothed ventrally with long slender hairs,
short, fine, cylinder bristles, and a series of five pairs of short
stout
spines
on
the
metatarsus.
There is
no
series of spines
on
the tibia, and there
are fewer cylinder
bristles. Chelicerae three times as long
as
wide. Propeltidium wider than long
by a ratio of 1 to 1.3. Eyes slightly
more
than one diameter apart. Genital
plate typical of family; it is wider than long by
a
ratio of 1
to
1.2."
Muma 1970a:
DIAGNOSIS:
Males and females colored and marked as for
Ammotrechclla
stimpsoni (Putnam).
Cheliceral and palpal characters also the same as for A. stimpsoni.
The tarsal spinelike setal formula agrees with that of Ammotrecha
Banks, sensu stricto, of Roewer (1934). The combined descriptions
of Pocock (1902) and Roewer (1934) are adequate for identification
except for the enigma of the tarsal setal formula.
Armas 1993:
Diagnosis.
El color del cuerpo varía desde amarillo claro hasta castaño; tergitos
con dos bandas laterales de color castaño oscuro, las cuales se fusionan
en los tres últimos escleritos. Propeltidio sin espículas, cubierto por
pelos acuminados de diferentes tamaños. Pedipalpos con abundantes
espículas, excepto en el fémur; protarso con cinco pares de espinas
ventrales. Dedo fijo del quelícero con cinco dientes basales internos y
cuatro basales externos.
Descripción de un macho (Volcán Mombacho).
Colorido en alcohol. Propeltidio, parapeltidia, mesopeltidio,
quelíceros y los dos tercios basales del fémur palpal, de color amarillo.
Pedipalpos, excepto lo referido del fémur, y pata IV, excepto los tarsos,
de
castaño. Patas III, de
castaño claro; I-II, de amarillo pálido y tergitos abdominales, de
amarillo muy pálido con dos anchas bandas laterales de color castaño
oscuro, excepto en el último tergito, que es totalmente castaño.
Propeltidio ligeramente más ancho que largo, cubierto por pelos
acuminados de pequeño y mediano tamaño, entre los que sobresalen cuatro
pelos de gran tamaño. Parapeltidia y mesopeltidio con numerosos pelos de
mediano y gran tamaño. Lóbulos laterales separados del prosoma por un
surco dorsal. Ojos separados por menos de un diámetro ocular (0,80).
Quelíceros cubiertos por abundantes pelos de gran tamaño y otros de
mediano y pequeño tamaño. Dedo movible con la siguiente fórmula dentaria:
1A, 1I, 1P, 1BI; mucrón de base poco ancha, más bien largo y sin
curvatura dorsal. Dedo fijo con una pequeña escotadura dorsal, casi a
nivel del diente principal; carina dorsal vestigial; fórmula dentaria:
2A, 1I, 1P, 4BE, 5BI; de los dientes BE, el segundo es el más pequeño;
de los dientes BI, los tres últimos (3, 4 y 5) comparten una base común
donde 3 es el mayor y 5 el menor.
Pedipalpos: fémur cubierto por cerdas
muy pequeñas, acuminadas; tibia, protarso y tarso con abundantes
espículas y algunos pelos acuminados muy largos. Protarso con cinco
pares de espinas ventrales.
Tergitos cubiertos por pelos de mediano y
pequeño tamaño, entre los que sobresalen algunos de mayor talla; hacia
los últimos tergitos los pelos se tornan largos y finos.
Patas.
Protarsos II-III con 1.1.1 espinas dorsales y 1.1.2 ventrales.
Dimensiones en la Tabla 2.
Hembra. Colorido similar al del macho.
Pedipalpos más cortos y sin espículas. Quelíceros, prosoma y tergitos
cubiertos por pelos mucho más finos que en el macho. Dedo fijo del
quelícero con carena dorsal pequeña. Opérculo genital (Fig. 19), 1,8
veces más ancho que largo.
Dimensions de Ammotrecha
stolli (Pocock)
[Extracted from Table 2]
Macho Hembra
Mombacho Sn. J. del Sur
Propeltidio, L
2.65
2.85
Propeltidio, A
2.80
3.20
Propeltidio, L/A 0.94
0.89
Quelicero, L
3.80
4.25
Quelicero, A
1.15
1.50
Quelicero, H
1.20
1.50
Pedipalpo, L
13.50
9.90
Femur Pata I, L
2.95
1.90
Femur Pata IV, L 5.00
3.50
L Total
12.20
9.10
Armas 1996:
El tipo de esta especie una hembra colectada en
Retalhuleu, Guatemala, y sa haila depositado en el Museo Británico de
Historia NaturaL Su distribución es la más amplia exhibida por un
solpúgido centroemericano: desde Costa Rica hasta el sureste de los EE.
UU. (Muma, 1970, 1986). Su patrón de colorido es muy parecido al de
Ammotrechella stimpsoní (Putnam). Puede considerarse una especie
bien conocida.
Armas 2004:
LOCALIDAD TIPO: Retalhuleau, Guatemala. DISTRIBUCIÓN:
México, Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica. TIPO: Hembra
holotipo UBMNH, No.8650). NOTAS: Ambos sexos, numerosas recolectas. Este
es el solífugo de más amplia distribución en Centroamérica.
DISTRIBUTION: Costa Rica; El
Salvador; Grenada; Guatemala; Mexico; Nicaragua; U.S.A. (Louisiana, Texas).
PUBLISHED RECORDS:
Banks 1909b:
Costa
Rica:
San Jose, 2nd May (Picado).
Roewer 1934: Guatemala (Retalhuleu), Nicaragua, Costa Rica (San Jose, Baranca, Bebedero, Mojica Guanacaste), Mexico (Alemanie Keda Oase, Teapa),
Grenada (Friederichsthal) [incl. A. picta].
Roewer 1941:
Mexico:
Flores, Ocotlan, 4 ♀;
Costa
Rica:
San José, 1 ♂, 1
♀ (Coll. Roewer, Nr. 5109/372).
Muma 1951:
United
States:
Louisiana:
Lake Ponchartrain, one
female (Marx).
Texas:
San Antonio, July 29, 1929, one female (M. Valeris).
Roewer 1954d:
El
Salvador::
Dept.
Santa Ana - Hacienda Los Planes in Gebirge von Metapan (1800 m), 1 pull., O.
Schuster l. 1-22-1952, SMF 8006; Dept. San Salvador - Umgebung des Instituto
Tropical in San Salvador (700 m) [120 ♂,♀. 1951, SMF 8007-8021; 31
♂,♀. 1952, o. Schuster l., SMF 8022-8028]; Dept. San Vicente - O-Kegel des
Vulkans San Vincente, Finca El Carmen (1300 m) [1 ♀, 8-10-1951, SMF 8029];
Dept. Morazán - Vulkan Cacaguatique, Finca San Pedro (1050 m) [2 pull.
13-9-1951, SMF 8030].
Muma 1986, 1987:
Mexico:
Chiapas
- San Cristobal de
las Casas, 29 October 1971 (Dennis E. Breedlove), 1 female;
El
Salvador:
Quezaltepeque, 5 July 1963 (M. Irwin and D. Q. Cavagnaro), 1 female.
Armas 1993: Un macho, volcán Mombacho,
noviembre 15, 1989, J.-C. Gantier (SEA). Una hembra, San Juan del Sur,
septiembre 15, 1987, J.-P. Desmedt (IES). Tres hembras, Cerro Telica, León,
julio de 1990, B. Garcete (SEA).
Armas
and Maes 1996: Un macho (lES),
León, enero de 1994, J.M. Maes. Un macho (SEA), León, noviembre de 1990, B.
Garcete. Un macho (SEA), León, octobre de 1990, B. Garcete. Dos machos (IES),
Las Flores, Masaya, 15 de junio, 1994, J.M. Maes, "U.V. Iight". Un juvenil
(SEA), Las Flores, Masaya, abril de 1993, C. Lecoq,
1.
Cantamessa.
NOTES:
Pocock
(1895a) compared this
species
and Ammotrechula gervaisii (Pocock)
[as C. Gervaisii Pocock] to Ammotrechella cubae (Lucas)
[as
C. cubae
Lucas], noting that both
resemble Ammotrechella cubae,
as described by Mons.
Simon, "in the structure and
dentition of their mandibles, spinulose armature of protarsus of palp, &c."
He noted that Ammotrecha stollii
further resembles Ammotrechella cubae in having the upperside of the
abdomen adorned with a median flavous band; but it appears to differ in
having the first, second, third, and fourth legs infuscate, with a conspicuous
flavous ring round the distal end of the tibia of the fourth. He
added, "According to Simon
C. cubae has the first, second, and third legs pale, and the fourth
reddish brown, with the base of the femur, extremity of the metatarsus, and
the tarsus clear testaceous." Kraepelin (1901) reports the range of the
species as Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Guatemala. Kraepelin (1908a)
noted that the markings on the segments of the palps and legs are darker in
the male than in the female. Roewer (1934) reported the range of this
species as Guatemala (Retalhuleu), Nicaragua, Costa Rica (San
Jose,
Baranca, Bebedero, Mojica
Guanacaste), Mexico (Alemanie Keda Oase, Teapa). Grenada (Friedrichsthal),
and regarded Ammotrecha picta Pocock as a synonym. Roewer
(1954a) reported receiving 1 ♂ and 2 ♀ from [El] Salvador and 1 ♀ from Costa
Rica for identification. Muma (1970a) stated: "If tarsa1 setal formulae are
valid, this
species is a senior synonym of
A.
nigrescens; otherwise it is a
junior synonym of A. stimpsoni."
He included the species in a
tabular presentation of some diagnostic characters of species of
Ammotrechinae, citing it as having the following attributes: palpal tarsus
and metatarsus dark, 5 pairs of spine-like setae on the pedipalp, and a
slight indentation above the flagellar attachment on the fixed cheliceral
finger of the male.
Vázquez (1981a) recorded the species from
Michoacan, Guerrero, and Chiapas, Mexico. Muma (1986, 1987) included
the species in a list of families, genera, and species previously recorded
from Mexico, Central America, and the West Indies. Armas (1993)
reported its range as including Central America (Costa Rica,
Nicaragua, Guatemala), North America (México, United States) and the
Antilles (Granada), and noted that en el cerro Telica it occurs
sympatrically with Ammotrechesta garcetei Armas.
Vázquez Rojas (1995) included the
species in a checklist of arachnids occurring in Mexico.
Armas (2004) listed the species in a catalog of the solifuges of Central
America and the Antilles, noting that it was found in
México, Guatemala, El
Salvador, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica, and is the most widely distributed
species in Central America. Brookhart and Brookhart (2006) included the species in their
checklist of North American solifugae.
|