The Arachnid Order Solifugae

IntroductionPhylogeny/TaxonomyBiogeography/EndemismBiology/EcologyCollections/ResearchBibliographyGlossaryLinks


PHYLOGENY/TAXONOMY

Phylogeny of the Solifugae
Keys to FamiliesFamily Ammotrechidae
AMMOTRECHINAE
  Ammotrecha
         Ammotrecha araucana
         Ammotrecha chiapasi
         Ammotrecha cobinensis
         Ammotrecha enriquei
         Ammotrecha friedlaenderi
         Ammotrecha itzaana
         Ammotrecha limbata
         Ammotrecha nigrescens
         Ammotrecha picta
         Ammotrecha stollii

  Ammotrechella
  Ammotrechesta
  Ammotrechinus
  Ammotrechula
  Antillotrecha
  Campostrecha

  Dasycleobis
  Neocleobis
  Pseudocleobis
MORTOLINAE
  Mortola
NOTHOPUGINAE
  Nothopuga
OLTACOLINAE
  Oltacola
SARONOMINAE
  Branchia
  Chinchippus
  Inessa
  Procleobis
  Saronomus
INCERTAE SEDIS
  Chileotrecha
  Eutrecha
  Xenotrecha
  Happlodontus

Family Ceromidae
Family Daesiidae
Family Eremobatidae
Family Galeodidae
Family Gylippidae
Family Hexisopodidae
Family Karschiidae
Family Melanoblossidae
Family Mummuciidae
Family RhagodidaeFamily Solpugidae
Catalog of the Solifugae

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Ammotrecha nigrescens Roewer 1934

Ammotrecha nigrescens ►Roewer, 1934: 598, figs 336e, 337f; ►Muma, 1970a: 46, 48, 50, 51, fig. 39; ►Muma, 1976: 26; ►Muma, 1986: 21; ►Muma, 1987: 21; Armas, 1996b: 32; Harvey, 2003: 200; ►Armas, 2004b: 60.
Ammotrecha nigricens: Armas, 1993: 55 (lapsus calami).

TYPES: Guatemala: [locality?], 1894 (Stoll), 1 male; and Costa Rica: San Jose Province - San Jose, [date, collector?], 2 females [?]. [Roewer (1934) indicated that he examined 1 male and 2 females from Guatemala and Costa Rica, including the type) in the British Museum of Natural History, but failed to indicate which of the specimens was the holotype.  Muma later located and characterized the male cited above, but did not designate it as a lectotype.] 

Original description:
Roewer, 1934: 598, figs 336e, 337f:

: "Die Spitze der Flagellum-Spelze reicht nur bis zum zum 1. Vorderzahn nach vorn; unbeweglicher Finger mit 4 lateralen und 3 medialen Wangenzähnen; Gebiß Abb. 337,]; Pedipalpen an Femur und Tibia nur behaart, am Metatarsus ventral mit 5 Paar Dornen und zahlreichen Zylinderborsten (Abb. 336, e); 2. und 3. Metatarsus dorsal mit je einer Längsreihe aus 3 Dornen und ventral wie auch 4. Metatarsus mit je 1.1.2 Dornen.  Färbung der Cheliceren und des Propeltidium dunkel gebräunt, erstere mit 2 noch dunkleren Längsstreifen, Opisthosoma dorsal dunkelbraun, mit vollständiger, breiter weißgelber Mittelbinde; Sternite, Coxen und Malleoli weißgelb, Pedipalpen bis auf den blaßgelben Tarsus ganz dunkelbraun; Korperlänge 12 mm."
Unbeweglicher Finger mit dorsalem, stark chitinisiertem, abgesetztem Buckel, mit 4 lateralen und 3 medialen Wangenzahnen; Gebiß im übrigen wie Abb. 338, b; Pedipalpen behaart, Metatarsus ventral mit 5 Paar Dornen und zahlreichen Zylinderborsten; Bewehrung der Beine und Färbung wie beim ; Körperlänge 18 mm.
♀: "Unbeweglicher Finger mit dorsalem, stark chitinisiertem, abgesetztem Buckel, mit 4 lateralen und 3 medialen Wangenzahnen; Gebiß im übrigen wie Abb. 338, b; Pedipalpen behaart, Metatarsus ventral mit 5 Paar Dornen und zahlreichen Zylinderborsten; Bewehrung der Beine und Färbung wie beim ♂; Körperlänge 18 mm."

[: The tip of the flagellar membrane extends forward only to the 1st anterior tooth; fixed finger with 4 lateral and 3 medial cheek teeth; [dentition fig. 337, e]; Pedipalp only hairy on femur and tibia, with 5 pairs of spines and numerous cylinder bristles ventrally on the metatarsus (fig. 336, e); 2nd and 3rd metatarsus dorsally with longitudinal row of 3 spines and ventrally, as with the 4th metatarsus, each with 1.1.2 spines.  Coloration of the chelicerae and the propeltidium darkly tanned, in the former with 2 even darker longitudinal stripes, opisthosoma dorsally entirely dark brown, with light tan middle patch; sternites, coxae and malleoli pale yellow, pedipalps entirely dark brown up to the pale yellow tarsus; Body length 12 mm.
♀: Fixed finger with dorsal, strongly chitinized , elevated hump, with 4 lateral and 3 medial cheek teeth; dentition as in Figure 338b.  Pedipalps hairy, metatarsus with 5 pairs of ventral spines and numerous cylinder bristles; spination of the legs and coloration as in the male.  Body length 18mm.]  

Fig. 337f - Right male chelicera, mesal view.

SUBSEQUENT ACCOUNTS:
Muma (1970b), examined the male type from Guatemala, and provided the following diagnosis:

"Except for the tarsal setal formulae, this species is identical with pale brown typically marked specimens of Ammotrechella stimpsoni (Putnam).  The tarsi of leg III have a spinelike setal formula of 1,2,2,1 and those of leg IV of 2,2-2-2,1 or as for Ammotrecha Roewer.  The metatarsal spinelike setae are, however, somewhat longer than on A. stimpsoni.  Females are unknown.  Figure 39 is of the only chelicera remaining with the type."

Fig. 39 - Right male chelicera, ectal view.

DISTRIBUTION: Guatemala, Costa Rica. 

Published Records: 
Armas 1993: Nicaragua: Una hembra, Corinto, León, marzo 26, 1989, sobre jocote (Spondias purpurascens), A. González, en termitero de Nasutitermes nigriceps (IES).

NOTES: Roewer (1934) attributed this species to Pocock, and reported that he examined specimens in the British Museum (including the type) from both Guatemala and Costa Rica (San Jose, San Jose Province), but provides no specific data for those specimens.  Muma (1970) commented that this species can be considered valid only if the tarsal setal formulae are correct and diagnostic, opining that it otherwise is a junior synonym of Ammotrechella stimpsoni (Putnam).   He did not indicate that he had examined the female specimens cited by Roewer (1934) in the original species description.  Muma (1976) included this species in a list of Western Hemisphere solifuges, recording its distribution as Costa Rica and Guatemala, noting that it was apparently known from two collections (both sexes).  He reported that the male type from Guatemala is in the BMNH, but that the fremale type was not located. Muma (1986, 1987) included this species in a list of families, genera, and species previously recorded from Mexico, Central America, and the West Indies.  He reported that this species has been recorded from Guatemala, Costa Rica (San Jose), and the West Indies, but provided no data regarding those records.  Armas (2004) included the species in a catalog of the solifuges of Central America and the Antilles, reporting its distribution as Guatemala and Costa Rica, and referred to a "macho holotipo" [male holotype] in the BMNH. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
   
 


THE UNAUTHORIZED COPYING, DISPLAYING OR OTHER USE OF PHOTOGRAPHS OR OTHER ORIGINAL CONTENT  FROM THIS SITE IS ILLLEGAL. 
© Copyright 2005-2008.  All images in this site, even if they do not include an individual statement of copyright, are protected under the U. S. Copyright Act.  They may not be "borrowed" or otherwise used without the express permission of their creators.  For permission, please submit your request to wsavary@yahoo.com.
The material included in this website is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants 0640245 and 0640219. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.